lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211015170020.GB16157@asgard.redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 19:00:20 +0200
From:   Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
To:     Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 04/15] mctp: Add sockaddr_mctp to uapi

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:20:42AM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>  struct sockaddr_mctp {
> +	unsigned short int	smctp_family;
> +	int			smctp_network;

struct mctp_skb_cb.net (as well as struct mctp_dev.net) are unsigned,
is it intentional that this field (along with struct mctp_sock.bind_net)
differs in signedness?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ