[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211015170020.GB16157@asgard.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 19:00:20 +0200
From: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 04/15] mctp: Add sockaddr_mctp to uapi
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:20:42AM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> struct sockaddr_mctp {
> + unsigned short int smctp_family;
> + int smctp_network;
struct mctp_skb_cb.net (as well as struct mctp_dev.net) are unsigned,
is it intentional that this field (along with struct mctp_sock.bind_net)
differs in signedness?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists