netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] ice: compact the file ice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2b0dbaf8-1033-b1a3-8976-83a785fbe682@linux.dev>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 22:22:28 +0800
From:   Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
To:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc:     jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] ice: compact the file ice_nvm.c


在 2021/10/18 22:05, Paul Menzel 写道:
> Dear Yanjun,
>
>
> Am 18.10.21 um 16:00 schrieb Yanjun Zhu:
>
>> 在 2021/10/18 21:44, Paul Menzel 写道:
>
>>> Am 18.10.21 um 15:17 schrieb yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev:
>>>> From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
>>>>
>>>> The function ice_aq_nvm_update_empr is not used, so remove it.
>>>
>>> Thank you for the patch. Could you please make the commit message 
>>> summary more descriptive? Maybe:
>>>
>>>> ice: Remove unused `ice_aq_nvm_update_empr()`
>>>
>>> If you find out, what commit removed the usage, that would be also 
>>> good to document, but it’s not that important.
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestion.
>>
>> IMO, removing the unused function is one method of compact file.
>>
>> I agree with you that the commit message summary is not important.
>
> Sorry, you misunderstood me. The commit message summary is my opinion 
> very important, as it’s what shown in `git log --oneline`, and in this 
> case everybody has to read the full commit message to know what the 
> commit actually as *compact* is not conveying this meaning and is 
> ambiguous.
>
> Not as important is finding the commit removing the last user, and 
> adding a Fixes tag with it.
Got it.
>
>> If someone finds more important problem in this commit, I will resend 
>> the
>>
>> patch and change the commit message summary based on your suggestion.
>
> It’d be great, if you sent an improved version.

I will resend the latest version.

Zhu Yanjun

>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul