lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <616d9ae958a68_1eb120856@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:03:53 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/2] bpf: keep track of verifier
 insn_processed

Dave Marchevsky wrote:
> This is a followup to discussion around RFC patchset "bpf: keep track of
> prog verification stats" [0]. The RFC elaborates on my usecase, but to
> summarize: keeping track of verifier stats for programs as they - and
> the kernels they run on - change over time can help developers of
> individual programs and BPF kernel folks.
> 
> The RFC added a verif_stats to the uapi which contained most of the info
> which verifier prints currently. Feedback here was to avoid polluting
> uapi with stats that might be meaningless after major changes to the
> verifier, but that insn_processed or conceptually similar number would
> exist in the long term and was safe to expose.
> 
> So let's expose just insn_processed via bpf_prog_info and fdinfo for now
> and explore good ways of getting more complicated stats in the future.
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210920151112.3770991-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
> 
> v1->v2:
>   * Rename uapi field from insn_processed to verified_insns [Daniel]
>   * use 31 bits of existing bitfield space in bpf_prog_info [Daniel]
>   * change underlying type from 64-> 32 bits [Daniel]
> 
> Dave Marchevsky (2):
>   bpf: add verified_insns to bpf_prog_info and fdinfo
>   selftests/bpf: add verif_stats test
> 
>  include/linux/bpf.h                           |  1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |  2 +-
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          |  8 +++--
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |  1 +
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |  2 +-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verif_stats.c    | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verif_stats.c
> 
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

For the series.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ