netdev - Re: [net-next RESEND PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: qca8k: tidy for loop in setup and add cpu port check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:48:12 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next RESEND PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: qca8k: tidy for loop in
 setup and add cpu port check

On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 16:56:45 +0200 Ansuel Smith wrote:
> Tidy and organize qca8k setup function from multiple for loop.
> Change for loop in bridge leave/join to scan all port and skip cpu port.
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>

There's some confusion in patchwork. I think previous posting got
applied, but patch 1 of this series git marked as applied.. while 
it was patch 2 that corresponds to previous posting..?

Please make sure you mark new postings as v2 v3 etc. It's not a problem
to post a vN+1 and say "no changes" in the change log, while it may be 
a problem if patchwork bot gets confused and doesn't mark series as
superseded appropriately.

I'm dropping the remainder of this series from patchwork, please rebase
and resend what's missing in net-next.

Thanks!