netdev - Re: [net-next RESEND PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: qca8k: tidy for loop in setup and add cpu port check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+_ehUzHm1+7MNNHg7CDmMpW5nZhzsyvG_pKm8drmSa6Mx5tNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Oct 2021 00:54:17 +0200
From:   Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next RESEND PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: qca8k: tidy for loop in
 setup and add cpu port check

>
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 16:56:45 +0200 Ansuel Smith wrote:
> > Tidy and organize qca8k setup function from multiple for loop.
> > Change for loop in bridge leave/join to scan all port and skip cpu port.
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
>
> There's some confusion in patchwork. I think previous posting got
> applied, but patch 1 of this series git marked as applied.. while
> it was patch 2 that corresponds to previous posting..?
>
> Please make sure you mark new postings as v2 v3 etc. It's not a problem
> to post a vN+1 and say "no changes" in the change log, while it may be
> a problem if patchwork bot gets confused and doesn't mark series as
> superseded appropriately.
>
> I'm dropping the remainder of this series from patchwork, please rebase
> and resend what's missing in net-next.
>
> Thanks!

Sorry for the mess. I think I got confused.
I resent these 2 patch (in one go) as i didn't add the net-next tag
and i thought they got ignored as the target was wrong.
I didn't receive any review or ack so i thought it was a good idea to
resend them in one go with the correct tag.
Hope it's not a stupid question but can you point me where should
i check to prevent this kind of error?
So anyway i both send these 2 patch as a dedicated patch with the
absent tag.