[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cee7948d-a637-ca07-6788-61500672f8cf@unstable.cc>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:59:01 +0200
From: Antonio Quartulli <a@...table.cc>
To: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sysctl addr_gen_mode does not control tunnel link-local addr
Hi,
On 20/10/2021 03:30, Stephen Suryaputra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that tunnels, especially sit before commit e5dd729460ca8
> ("ip/ip6_gre: use the same logic as SIT interfaces when computing v6LL
> address"), generates link-local addr regardless of addr_gen_mode
> setting. Is this a bug, or is there a specific reason?
>
> In my system, the link-local addr are generated by a userspace process.
> So, we set net.ipv6.conf.<dev>.addr_gen_mode to 1 (IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_NONE).
>
> The commit e5dd729460ca8 doesn't change the behavior as it is renaming
> sit_add_v4_addrs() to add_v4_addrs() as make it generic for GRE/IP6GRE
> cases. I'm not sure what the current behavior is for GRE, i.e. whether
> addr_gen_mode can control the generation of link-local addr.
>
> If this is a bug or oversight, I think this diff should fix it and I can
> put a formal patch.
When I implemented this behavior for SIT interfaces I basically ported
what is currently happening for GRE.
Therefore, any change you apply to SIT, should also be reflected in the
GRE code path.
As of now, the SIT/GRE addrgen logic does not consider the mode setting
at all. But I am not sure it'd be easy to support all the values.
For sure, supporting IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_NONE is a low hanging fruit and
should be implemented.
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index c6a90b7bbb70..da7e83699eef 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -3392,6 +3392,8 @@ static void addrconf_sit_config(struct net_device
> *dev)
> return;
> }
>
> + if (idev->cnf.addr_gen_mode == IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_NONE)
> + return;
Please add an empty line here.
> add_v4_addrs(idev);
>
> if (dev->flags&IFF_POINTOPOINT)
>
> The commit mention about addressing violation of RFC4291 on GRE and the diff
> above doesn't cause it to change as the default addr_gen_mode is 0
> (IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_EUI64).
Other than my nitpick above, I'd suggest applying the same change to the
GRE code path, as the behavior should be the same.
Moreover, do you think that addrconf_add_mroute() should not be executed
in this case? Otherwise you could simply add your new code into
add_v4_addrs().
Regards,
--
Antonio Quartulli
Powered by blists - more mailing lists