[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3aa076f0e39a485ca090f8c14682b694@realtek.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:46:09 +0000
From: Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"cgel.zte@...il.com" <cgel.zte@...il.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"lv.ruyi@....com.cn" <lv.ruyi@....com.cn>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] rtw89: fix error function parameter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvalo=codeaurora.org@...codeaurora.org <kvalo=codeaurora.org@...codeaurora.org> On Behalf Of Kalle
> Valo
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 4:50 PM
> To: cgel.zte@...il.com
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>; lv.ruyi@....com.cn;
> linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Zeal Robot
> <zealci@....com.cn>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw89: fix error function parameter
>
> cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
>
> > From: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@....com.cn>
> >
> > This patch fixes the following Coccinelle warning:
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c:753:
> > WARNING possible condition with no effect (if == else)
> >
> > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> > Signed-off-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@....com.cn>
> > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
>
> Failed to apply, please rebase on top of wireless-drivers-next.
>
> error: patch failed: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c:753
> error: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c: patch does not apply
> error: Did you hand edit your patch?
> It does not apply to blobs recorded in its index.
> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
> Applying: rtw89: fix error function parameter
> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> Patch failed at 0001 rtw89: fix error function parameter
>
> Patch set to Changes Requested.
>
I think this is because the patch is translated into spaces instead of tabs,
in this and following statements.
" if (is_2g)"
--
Ping-Ke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists