netdev - Re: [PATCH] rtw89: fix error function parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 13:03:43 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Cc:     "cgel.zte\@gmail.com" <cgel.zte@...il.com>,
        "davem\@davemloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba\@kernel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "lv.ruyi\@zte.com.cn" <lv.ruyi@....com.cn>,
        "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw89: fix error function parameter

Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kvalo=codeaurora.org@...codeaurora.org
>> <kvalo=codeaurora.org@...codeaurora.org> On Behalf Of Kalle
>> Valo
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 4:50 PM
>> To: cgel.zte@...il.com
>> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; Pkshih
>> <pkshih@...ltek.com>; lv.ruyi@....com.cn;
>> linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
>> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Zeal Robot
>> <zealci@....com.cn>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw89: fix error function parameter
>> 
>> cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
>> 
>> > From: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@....com.cn>
>> >
>> > This patch fixes the following Coccinelle warning:
>> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c:753:
>> > WARNING  possible condition with no effect (if == else)
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
>> > Signed-off-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@....com.cn>
>> > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
>> 
>> Failed to apply, please rebase on top of wireless-drivers-next.
>> 
>> error: patch failed: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c:753
>> error: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c: patch does not apply
>> error: Did you hand edit your patch?
>> It does not apply to blobs recorded in its index.
>> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
>> Applying: rtw89: fix error function parameter
>> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
>> Patch failed at 0001 rtw89: fix error function parameter
>> 
>> Patch set to Changes Requested.
>> 
>
> I think this is because the patch is translated into spaces instead of tabs, 
> in this and following statements.
> "                if (is_2g)"

Ah, I did wonder why it failed as I didn't see any similar patches. We
have an item about this in the wiki:

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#format_issues

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches