[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211021114132.8196-3-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:41:31 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus:
# test_progs -t perf_buffer
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec
skipping offline CPU #4
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:buf_cnt 0 nsec
...
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:fd_check 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:drain_buf 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:consume_buf 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:FAIL:cpu_seen cpu 5 not seen
#88 perf_buffer:FAIL
Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
If the offline cpu is from the middle of the possible set,
we get mismatch with possible and online cpu buffers.
The perf buffer test calls perf_buffer__consume_buffer for
all 'possible' cpus, but the library holds only 'online'
cpu buffers and perf_buffer__consume_buffer returns them
based on index.
Adding extra (online) index to keep track of online buffers,
we need the original (possible) index to trigger trace on
proper cpu.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
index 877600392851..0b0cd045979b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ int trigger_on_cpu(int cpu)
void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
{
- int err, on_len, nr_on_cpus = 0, nr_cpus, i;
+ int err, on_len, nr_on_cpus = 0, nr_cpus, i, j;
struct perf_buffer_opts pb_opts = {};
struct test_perf_buffer *skel;
cpu_set_t cpu_seen;
@@ -111,15 +111,15 @@ void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
"got %zu, expected %d\n", perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb), nr_on_cpus))
goto out_close;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
+ for (i = 0, j = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
if (i >= on_len || !online[i])
continue;
- fd = perf_buffer__buffer_fd(pb, i);
+ fd = perf_buffer__buffer_fd(pb, j);
CHECK(fd < 0 || last_fd == fd, "fd_check", "last fd %d == fd %d\n", last_fd, fd);
last_fd = fd;
- err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, i);
+ err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, j);
if (CHECK(err, "drain_buf", "cpu %d, err %d\n", i, err))
goto out_close;
@@ -127,12 +127,13 @@ void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
if (trigger_on_cpu(i))
goto out_close;
- err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, i);
- if (CHECK(err, "consume_buf", "cpu %d, err %d\n", i, err))
+ err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, j);
+ if (CHECK(err, "consume_buf", "cpu %d, err %d\n", j, err))
goto out_close;
if (CHECK(!CPU_ISSET(i, &cpu_seen), "cpu_seen", "cpu %d not seen\n", i))
goto out_close;
+ j++;
}
out_free_pb:
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists