[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211021114132.8196-4-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:41:32 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Use nanosleep tracepoint in perf buffer test
The perf buffer tests triggers trace with nanosleep syscall,
but monitors all syscalls, which results in lot of data in the
buffer and makes it harder to debug. Let's lower the trace
traffic and monitor just nanosleep syscall.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c
index d37ce29fd393..a08874c5bdf2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ struct {
__type(value, int);
} perf_buf_map SEC(".maps");
-SEC("tp/raw_syscalls/sys_enter")
+SEC("tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
int handle_sys_enter(void *ctx)
{
int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists