netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5] mctp: Implement extended addressing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211025153418.GA6853@asgard.redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:34:18 +0200
From:   Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     jk@...econstruct.com.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        matt@...econstruct.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] mctp: Implement extended addressing

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 04:15:49PM +0100, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:27:57 +0800
> 
> > @@ -152,10 +155,16 @@ struct mctp_sk_key {
> >  
> >  struct mctp_skb_cb {
> >  	unsigned int	magic;
> > -	unsigned int	net;
> > +	int		net;
> > +	int		ifindex; /* extended/direct addressing if set */
> > +	unsigned char	halen;
> >  	mctp_eid_t	src;
> > +	unsigned char	haddr[];
> >  };
> >  
> putting a variably sized type in the skb control blocxk is not a good idea.
> Overruns will be silent, nothing in the typing protects you from udsing more space
> han exists in skb->cb.
> 
> Plrease find another way, thank you.

haddr[MAX_ADDR_LEN]?  It is defined to 32 bytes.