[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211025221342.806029-3-eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:13:41 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: use MAX_TCP_HEADER in tcp_stream_alloc_skb
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Both IPv4 and IPv6 uses same reserve, no need risking
cache line misses to fetch its value.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 68dd580dba3d0e04412466868135c49225a4a33b..121400557fde898283a8eae3b09d93479c4a089e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ struct sk_buff *tcp_stream_alloc_skb(struct sock *sk, int size, gfp_t gfp,
if (unlikely(tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk)))
sk_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
- skb = alloc_skb_fclone(size + sk->sk_prot->max_header, gfp);
+ skb = alloc_skb_fclone(size + MAX_TCP_HEADER, gfp);
if (likely(skb)) {
bool mem_scheduled;
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ struct sk_buff *tcp_stream_alloc_skb(struct sock *sk, int size, gfp_t gfp,
mem_scheduled = sk_wmem_schedule(sk, skb->truesize);
}
if (likely(mem_scheduled)) {
- skb_reserve(skb, sk->sk_prot->max_header);
+ skb_reserve(skb, MAX_TCP_HEADER);
/*
* Make sure that we have exactly size bytes
* available to the caller, no more, no less.
--
2.33.0.1079.g6e70778dc9-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists