[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXkTihiRKKJIc9M6@krava>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:53:30 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Fix BTF data for modules
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 09:12:31PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:03 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:54:48PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 5:05 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > hi,
> > > > I'm trying to enable BTF for kernel module in fedora,
> > > > and I'm getting big increase on modules sizes on s390x arch.
> > > >
> > > > Size of modules in total - kernel dir under /lib/modules/VER/
> > > > from kernel-core and kernel-module packages:
> > > >
> > > > current new
> > > > aarch64 60M 76M
> > > > ppc64le 53M 66M
> > > > s390x 21M 41M
> > > > x86_64 64M 79M
> > > >
> > > > The reason for higher increase on s390x was that dedup algorithm
> > > > did not detect some of the big kernel structs like 'struct module',
> > > > so they are duplicated in the kernel module BTF data. The s390x
> > > > has many small modules that increased significantly in size because
> > > > of that even after compression.
> > > >
> > > > First issues was that the '--btf_gen_floats' option is not passed
> > > > to pahole for kernel module BTF generation.
> > > >
> > > > The other problem is more tricky and is the reason why this patchset
> > > > is RFC ;-)
> > > >
> > > > The s390x compiler generates multiple definitions of the same struct
> > > > and dedup algorithm does not seem to handle this at the moment.
> > > >
> > > > I put the debuginfo and btf dump of the s390x pnet.ko module in here:
> > > > http://people.redhat.com/~jolsa/kmodbtf/
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if you'd like to see other info/files.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hard to tell what's going on without vmlinux itself. Can you upload a
> > > corresponding kernel image with BTF in it?
> >
> > sure, uploaded
> >
>
> vmlinux.btfdump:
>
> [174] FLOAT 'float' size=4
> [175] FLOAT 'double' size=8
>
> VS
>
> pnet.btfdump:
>
> [89318] INT 'float' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=(none)
> [89319] INT 'double' size=8 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=64 encoding=(none)
ugh, that's with no fix applied, sry
I applied the first patch and uploaded new files
now when I compare the 'module' struct from vmlinux:
[885] STRUCT 'module' size=1280 vlen=70
and same one from pnet.ko:
[89323] STRUCT 'module' size=1280 vlen=70
they seem to completely match, all the fields
and yet it still appears in the kmod's BTF
thanks,
jirka
>
>
> > jirka
> >
> > >
> > > > I found code in dedup that seems to handle such situation for arrays,
> > > > and added 'some' fix for structs. With that change I can no longer
> > > > see vmlinux's structs in kernel module BTF data, but I have no idea
> > > > if that breaks anything else.
> > > >
> > > > thoughts? thanks,
> > > > jirka
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Jiri Olsa (2):
> > > > kbuild: Unify options for BTF generation for vmlinux and modules
> > > > bpf: Add support to detect and dedup instances of same structs
> > > >
> > > > Makefile | 3 +++
> > > > scripts/Makefile.modfinal | 2 +-
> > > > scripts/link-vmlinux.sh | 11 +----------
> > > > scripts/pahole-flags.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > > > 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100755 scripts/pahole-flags.sh
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists