[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzabyAdsrUoRx58MZKbwVBGa93247sw8pwU62N_wNhSZSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 21:12:31 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Fix BTF data for modules
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:03 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:54:48PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 5:05 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > hi,
> > > I'm trying to enable BTF for kernel module in fedora,
> > > and I'm getting big increase on modules sizes on s390x arch.
> > >
> > > Size of modules in total - kernel dir under /lib/modules/VER/
> > > from kernel-core and kernel-module packages:
> > >
> > > current new
> > > aarch64 60M 76M
> > > ppc64le 53M 66M
> > > s390x 21M 41M
> > > x86_64 64M 79M
> > >
> > > The reason for higher increase on s390x was that dedup algorithm
> > > did not detect some of the big kernel structs like 'struct module',
> > > so they are duplicated in the kernel module BTF data. The s390x
> > > has many small modules that increased significantly in size because
> > > of that even after compression.
> > >
> > > First issues was that the '--btf_gen_floats' option is not passed
> > > to pahole for kernel module BTF generation.
> > >
> > > The other problem is more tricky and is the reason why this patchset
> > > is RFC ;-)
> > >
> > > The s390x compiler generates multiple definitions of the same struct
> > > and dedup algorithm does not seem to handle this at the moment.
> > >
> > > I put the debuginfo and btf dump of the s390x pnet.ko module in here:
> > > http://people.redhat.com/~jolsa/kmodbtf/
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you'd like to see other info/files.
> > >
> >
> > Hard to tell what's going on without vmlinux itself. Can you upload a
> > corresponding kernel image with BTF in it?
>
> sure, uploaded
>
vmlinux.btfdump:
[174] FLOAT 'float' size=4
[175] FLOAT 'double' size=8
VS
pnet.btfdump:
[89318] INT 'float' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=(none)
[89319] INT 'double' size=8 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=64 encoding=(none)
> jirka
>
> >
> > > I found code in dedup that seems to handle such situation for arrays,
> > > and added 'some' fix for structs. With that change I can no longer
> > > see vmlinux's structs in kernel module BTF data, but I have no idea
> > > if that breaks anything else.
> > >
> > > thoughts? thanks,
> > > jirka
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Jiri Olsa (2):
> > > kbuild: Unify options for BTF generation for vmlinux and modules
> > > bpf: Add support to detect and dedup instances of same structs
> > >
> > > Makefile | 3 +++
> > > scripts/Makefile.modfinal | 2 +-
> > > scripts/link-vmlinux.sh | 11 +----------
> > > scripts/pahole-flags.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > > 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100755 scripts/pahole-flags.sh
> > >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists