netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] igb: unbreak I2C bit-banging on i350

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:25:55 +0000
From:   "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To:     "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "jan.kundrat@...net.cz" <jan.kundrat@...net.cz>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        "Brelinski, Tony" <tony.brelinski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] igb: unbreak I2C bit-banging on i350

On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 09:30 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:55:07 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> > From: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@...net.cz>
> > 
> > The driver tried to use Linux' native software I2C bus master
> > (i2c-algo-bits) for exporting the I2C interface that talks to the
> > SFP
> > cage(s) towards userspace. As-is, however, the physical SCL/SDA
> > pins
> > were not moving at all, staying at logical 1 all the time.
> 
> So targeting net-next because this never worked?

Correct. Would you prefer I send this patch via net instead?

Thanks,
Tony