[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYsMn6HpYHyJZ8c9@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:04:47 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>, jeyu@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: Fix implicit type conversion
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:56:38PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>
> > If we're going to do this we we must ask, is it really worth it and
> > moving forward then add a semantic patch rule which will pick up on
> > misuses.
>
> Please, no!
>
> This guy has been going around sending silly patches on his own, but the
> moment you add this script all the robots will join him, adding to the
> pile of useless crap we get to wade through each day.
>
> I've yet to see one of these patches fix an actual problem.
Glad we were able to swat this fly fast.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists