netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: fix memory leak in fib6_rule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211123200347.597e2daf@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:03:47 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        msizanoen1 <msizanoen@...labs.xyz>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: fix memory leak in fib6_rule_suppress

On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:48:32 +0100 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> The original author of this commit and commit message is anonymous and
> is therefore unable to sign off on it. Greg suggested that I do the sign
> off, extracting it from the bugzilla entry above, and post it properly.
> The patch "seems to work" on first glance, but I haven't looked deeply
> at it yet and therefore it doesn't have my Reviewed-by, even though I'm
> submitting this patch on the author's behalf. And it should probably get
> a good look from the v6 fib folks. The original author should be on this
> thread to address issues that come off, and I'll shephard additional
> versions that he has.

Does the fact that the author responded to the patch undermine the need
for this special handling?