netdev - Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: fix dflt policy check when there is no policy configured

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211125093040.GD427717@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:30:40 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <antony.antony@...unet.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: fix dflt policy check when there is no
 policy configured

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:33:13AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> When there is no policy configured on the system, the default policy is
> checked in xfrm_route_forward. However, it was done with the wrong
> direction (XFRM_POLICY_FWD instead of XFRM_POLICY_OUT).
> The default policy for XFRM_POLICY_FWD was checked just before, with a call
> to xfrm[46]_policy_check().
> 
> CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 2d151d39073a ("xfrm: Add possibility to set the default to block if we have no policy")
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>

Applied, thanks Nicolas!