netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] fs/binfmt_elf: replace open-coded string copy with get_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:22:40 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-perf-use." <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] fs/binfmt_elf: replace open-coded string copy
 with get_task_comm

On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:01:27 +0800
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote:

> There are three options,
> - option 1
>   comment on all the hard-coded 16 to explain why it is hard-coded
> - option 2
>   replace the hard-coded 16 that can be replaced and comment on the
> others which can't be replaced.
> - option 3
>    replace the hard-coded 16 that can be replaced and specifically
> define TASK_COMM_LEN_16 in other files which can't include
> linux/sched.h.
> 
> Which one do you prefer ?
> 

Option 3. Since TASK_COMM_LEN_16 is, by it's name, already hard coded to
16, it doesn't really matter if you define it in more than one location.

Or we could define it in another header that include/sched.h can include.

The idea of having TASK_COMM_LEN_16 is to easily grep for it, and also know
exactly what it is used for when people see it being used.

-- Steve