[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211130191235.0af15022@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:12:35 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sunil Sudhakar Rani <sunrani@...dia.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Bodong Wang <bodong@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] devlink: Add support to set port function
as trusted
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:17:29 +0000 Sunil Sudhakar Rani wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:43:06 +0200 Sunil Rani wrote:
> > > The device/firmware decides how to define privileges and access to resources.
> >
> > Great API definition. Nack
>
> Sorry for the late response. We agree that the current definition is vague.
>
> What we meant is that the enforcement is done by device/FW.
> We simply want to allow VF/SF to access privileged or restricted resource such as physical port counters.
> So how about defining the api such that:
> This knob allows the VF/SF to access restricted resource such as physical port counters.
You need to say more about the use case, I don't understand
what you're doing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists