lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 5 Dec 2021 22:25:13 +0800
From:   yanteng si <siyanteng01@...il.com>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: Remove unnecessary indentation in the comments
 of phy_device

Russell King (Oracle) <linux@...linux.org.uk> 于2021年12月5日周日 21:45写道:
>
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 09:21:41PM +0800, Yanteng Si wrote:
> > Fix warning as:
> >
> > linux-next/Documentation/networking/kapi:122: ./include/linux/phy.h:543: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> > linux-next/Documentation/networking/kapi:122: ./include/linux/phy.h:544: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> > linux-next/Documentation/networking/kapi:122: ./include/linux/phy.h:546: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
>
> This seems to be at odds with the documentation in
> Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst.
>
> The warning refers to lines 543, 544 and 546.
>
> 543: *              Bits [23:16] are currently reserved for future use.
> 544: *              Bits [31:24] are reserved for defining generic
> 545: *                           PHY driver behavior.
> 546: * @irq: IRQ number of the PHY's interrupt (-1 if none)
>
> This doesn't look quite right with the warning messages above, because
> 544 doesn't unindent, and I've checked net-next, net, and mainline
> trees, and they're all the same.
They are not always precise.
> So, I think we first need to establish exactly which lines you are
> seeing this warning for before anyone can make a suggestion.
Dear Russell

My configuration environment and operation steps are as follows:

[siyanteng@...rling]$ cd linux-next
[siyanteng@...rling]$ ./scripts/sphinx-pre-install
Detected OS: CentOS Linux release 8.5.2111.
Sphinx version: 2.4.4


All optional dependencies are met.
Needed package dependencies are met.
[siyanteng@...rling]$ . sphinx_2.4.4/bin/activate
(sphinx_2.4.4) [siyanteng@...rling]$ make cleandocs
(sphinx_2.4.4) [siyanteng@...rling]$ make htmldocs

Thanks,
Yanteng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists