[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ya4OP+jQYd/UwiQK@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:21:03 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ameer Hamza <amhamza.mgc@...il.com>,
Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
Cc: vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: initialize return variable on
declaration
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 04:32:19PM +0500, Ameer Hamza wrote:
> Uninitialized err variable defined in mv88e6393x_serdes_power
> function may cause undefined behaviour if it is called from
> mv88e6xxx_serdes_power_down context.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: 1494644 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ameer Hamza <amhamza.mgc@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
> index 55273013bfb5..33727439724a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
> @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ int mv88e6393x_serdes_power(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int lane,
> bool on)
> {
> u8 cmode = chip->ports[port].cmode;
> - int err;
> + int err = 0;
>
> if (port != 0 && port != 9 && port != 10)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Hi Marek
This warning likely comes from cmode not being a SERDES mode, and that
is not handles in the switch statementing. Do we want an
default:
err = EINVAL;
?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists