lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:28:02 +0000
From:   Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] r8169: support dash

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 11:04 PM
[...]
> Ah, I've only spotted the enable/disable knob in the patch.
> If you're exchanging arbitrary binary data with the FW we
> can't help you. It's not going to fly upstream. 

How is it that we only provide certain basic settings,
such as IPv4 address, IPv6 address, and so on? Then,
they are not the arbitrary binary data.

Could devlink param be used for more than 4 bytes settings?
At least the IPv6 address is longer.

Besides, we need the information of SMBIOS which could
be 4K ~ 8K bytes data. Is there any way we could transmit
it to firmware?

Best Regards,
Hayes


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ