[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tufjfrw0.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:00:15 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next-2021-12-07
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 14:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Kalle Valo wrote:
>> here's a pull request to net-next tree, more info below. Please let me know if
>> there are any problems.
>
> Pulled, thanks! Could you chase the appropriate people so that the new
> W=1 C=1 warnings get resolved before the merge window's here?
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211207144211.A9949C341C1@smtp.kernel.org/
Just so that I understand right, you are referring to this patchwork
test:
Errors and warnings before: 111 this patch: 115
https://patchwork.hopto.org/static/nipa/591659/12662005/build_32bit/
And you want the four new warnings to be fixed? That can be quite time
consuming, to be honest I would rather revert the commits than using a
lot of my time trying to get people fix the warnings. Is there an easy
way to find what are the new warnings?
But in the big picture are you saying the net trees now have a rule that
no new W=1 and C=1 warnings are allowed? I do test ath10k and ath11k
drivers for W=1 and C=1 warnings, but all other drivers are on their own
in this regard. At the moment I have no tooling in place to check all
wireless drivers.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists