[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <163948681280.21223.16560273283811595367.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:00:12 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
ansuelsmth@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] DSA tagger-owned storage fixups
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 03:45:33 +0200 you wrote:
> It seems that the DSA tagger-owned storage changes were insufficiently
> tested and do not work in all cases. Specifically, the NXP Bluebox 3
> (arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-bluebox3.dts) got broken by
> these changes, because
> (a) I forgot that DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1110 exists and differs from
> DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105
> (b) the Bluebox 3 uses a DSA switch tree with 2 switches, and the
> tagger-owned storage patches don't cover that use case well, it
> seems
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/3] net: dsa: tag_sja1105: fix zeroization of ds->priv on tag proto disconnect
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e2f01bfe1406
- [net-next,2/3] net: dsa: sja1105: fix broken connection with the sja1110 tagger
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c8a2a011cd04
- [net-next,3/3] net: dsa: make tagging protocols connect to individual switches from a tree
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7f2973149c22
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists