netdev - Re: [PATCH V7 1/5] swiotlb: Add swiotlb bounce buffer remap function for HV IVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:36:56 +0800
From:   Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, kys@...rosoft.com,
        haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
        decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, arnd@...db.de,
        hch@...radead.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com,
        michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, brijesh.singh@....com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
        hch@....de, joro@...tes.org, parri.andrea@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/5] swiotlb: Add swiotlb bounce buffer remap function
 for HV IVM

On 12/14/2021 12:45 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/12/21 11:14 PM, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>> In Isolation VM with AMD SEV, bounce buffer needs to be accessed via
>> extra address space which is above shared_gpa_boundary (E.G 39 bit
>> address line) reported by Hyper-V CPUID ISOLATION_CONFIG. The access
>> physical address will be original physical address + shared_gpa_boundary.
>> The shared_gpa_boundary in the AMD SEV SNP spec is called virtual top of
>> memory(vTOM). Memory addresses below vTOM are automatically treated as
>> private while memory above vTOM is treated as shared.
> 
> This seems to be independently reintroducing some of the SEV
> infrastructure.  Is it really OK that this doesn't interact at all with
> any existing SEV code?
> 
> For instance, do we need a new 'swiotlb_unencrypted_base', or should
> this just be using sme_me_mask somehow?

Hi Dave:
        Thanks for your review. Hyper-V provides a para-virtualized
confidential computing solution based on the AMD SEV function and not
expose sev&sme capabilities to guest. So sme_me_mask is unset in the
Hyper-V Isolation VM. swiotlb_unencrypted_base is more general solution
to handle such case of different address space for encrypted and
decrypted memory and other platform also may reuse it.