netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: fec: reset phy on resume after power-up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211216113104.GC4190@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:31:04 +0100
From:   Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
        "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: fec: reset phy on resume after power-up

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:28:19PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:24:33PM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:24:24AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I think you need to move the regulator into phylib, so the PHY driver
> > > can do the right thing. It is really the only entity which knows what
> > > is the correct thing to do.
> 
> > Do you believe that the right place is the phylib and not the phy driver?
> > Is this generic enough?
> 
> It is split. phylib can do the lookup in DT, get the regulator and
> provide a helper to enable/disable it. So very similar to the reset.
Sounds good.

Can we safely assume that we do have at most one regulator for the phy?

Francesco