[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ybsj3bTp72Vx6ShN@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:32:45 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: fec: reset phy on resume after power-up
> Can we safely assume that we do have at most one regulator for the phy?
Seems like a reasonable assumption.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists