[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211217092545.30204-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:25:45 +0800
From: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] xdp: move the if dev statements to the first
The xdp_rxq_info_unreg() called by xdp_rxq_info_reg() is meaningless when
dev is NULL, so move the if dev statements to the first.
Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
---
net/core/xdp.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
index 5ddc29f29bad..7fe1df85f505 100644
--- a/net/core/xdp.c
+++ b/net/core/xdp.c
@@ -159,6 +159,11 @@ static void xdp_rxq_info_init(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq)
int xdp_rxq_info_reg(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq,
struct net_device *dev, u32 queue_index, unsigned int napi_id)
{
+ if (!dev) {
+ WARN(1, "Missing net_device from driver");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
if (xdp_rxq->reg_state == REG_STATE_UNUSED) {
WARN(1, "Driver promised not to register this");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -169,11 +174,6 @@ int xdp_rxq_info_reg(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq,
xdp_rxq_info_unreg(xdp_rxq);
}
- if (!dev) {
- WARN(1, "Missing net_device from driver");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
/* State either UNREGISTERED or NEW */
xdp_rxq_info_init(xdp_rxq);
xdp_rxq->dev = dev;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists