netdev - [PATCH v2 2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211227130713.66933-2-wangqiang.wq.frank@bytedance.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Dec 2021 21:07:13 +0800
From:   Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@...edance.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, hengqi.chen@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhouchengming@...edance.com,
        songmuchun@...edance.com, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
        shekairui@...edance.com,
        Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function

If repeated legacy kprobes on same function in one process,
libbpf will register using the same probe name and got -EBUSY
error. So append index to the probe name format to fix this
problem.

Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@...edance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index b7d6c951fa09..698e8864da02 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -9634,7 +9634,10 @@ static int append_to_file(const char *file, const char *fmt, ...)
 static void gen_kprobe_legacy_event_name(char *buf, size_t buf_sz,
 					 const char *kfunc_name, size_t offset)
 {
-	snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset);
+	static int index = 0;
+
+	snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx_%d", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset,
+		 __sync_fetch_and_add(&index, 1));
 }
 
 static int add_kprobe_event_legacy(const char *probe_name, bool retprobe,
-- 
2.20.1