[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164142600886.21166.4094526896575840947.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 23:40:08 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@...edance.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
hengqi.chen@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhouchengming@...edance.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
shekairui@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 21:07:12 +0800 you wrote:
> Fix a bug in commit 46ed5fc33db9, which wrongly used the
> func_name instead of probe_name to register legacy kprobe.
>
> Fixes: 46ed5fc33db9 ("libbpf: Refactor and simplify legacy kprobe code")
> Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@...il.com>
> Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@...edance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2,1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/71cff670baff
- [v2,2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/51a33c60f1c2
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists