lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ycrfjr7wh6IhN+rF@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:57:34 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
Cc:     Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>,
        "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 07/13] net: dsa: realtek: add new mdio
 interface for drivers

> > > +int realtek_mdio_read_reg(struct realtek_priv *priv, u32 addr, u32 *data)
> > > +{
> > > +     u32 phy_id = priv->phy_id;
> > > +     struct mii_bus *bus = priv->bus;
> > > +
> > > +     BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> >
> > Again, please don't use BUG here - just make sure this never happens (it
> > looks OK to me). There is a separate warning in mutex_lock which may
> > print a stacktrace if the kernel is configured to do so.
> 
> OK. So, is it safe to simply drop it?

Yes. The MDIO core will never call this in interrupt context.

If you want to be paranoid, use might_sleep(); and build your kernel
with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.

     Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ