[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJq09z6_ZWvcnbO7VvGGU8ayBYGU1eVR72G7mWgZGNTNFkdZjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 16:44:26 -0300
From: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] net: dsa: realtek: use phy_read in ds->ops
> > static int realtek_smi_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int regnum)
> > {
> > - struct realtek_priv *priv = bus->priv;
> > + struct dsa_switch *ds = ((struct realtek_priv *)bus->priv)->ds;
>
> No need to cast a void pointer, this applies throughout the entire patch
> series.
> --
Hi Florian,
Apologize for my poor C experience but I didn't understand your
suggestion. Simply removing the cast will not work because bus->priv
is void* and it needs to know it is realtek_priv in order to
indirectly reference ds. Should I keep the local priv variable instead
of removing it (this way, cast is not needed)?
Luiz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists