lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 3 Jan 2022 19:01:30 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, menglong8.dong@...il.com
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, dsahern@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, nhorman@...driver.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        jonathan.lemon@...il.com, alobakin@...me, keescook@...omium.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, talalahmad@...gle.com, haokexin@...il.com,
        imagedong@...cent.com, atenart@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        weiwan@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de, vvs@...tuozzo.com,
        cong.wang@...edance.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, mengensun@...cent.com,
        mungerjiang@...cent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] net: skb: introduce
 kfree_skb_with_reason() and use it for tcp and udp

On 1/3/22 6:47 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 05:32:37PM +0800, menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
>>
>> In this series patch, the interface kfree_skb_with_reason() is
>> introduced(), which is used to collect skb drop reason, and pass
>> it to 'kfree_skb' tracepoint. Therefor, 'drop_monitor' or eBPF is
>> able to monitor abnormal skb with detail reason.
>>
> 
> We already something close, __dev_kfree_skb_any(). Can't we unify
> all of these?

Specifically?

The 'reason' passed around by those is either SKB_REASON_CONSUMED or
SKB_REASON_DROPPED and is used to call kfree_skb vs consume_skb. i.e.,
this is unrelated to this patch set and goal.

> 
> 
>> In fact, this series patches are out of the intelligence of David
>> and Steve, I'm just a truck man :/
>>
> 
> I think there was another discussion before yours, which I got involved
> as well.
> 
>> Previous discussion is here:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211118105752.1d46e990@gandalf.local.home/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/67b36bd8-2477-88ac-83a0-35a1eeaf40c9@gmail.com/
>>
>> In the first patch, kfree_skb_with_reason() is introduced and
>> the 'reason' field is added to 'kfree_skb' tracepoint. In the
>> second patch, 'kfree_skb()' in replaced with 'kfree_skb_with_reason()'
>> in tcp_v4_rcv(). In the third patch, 'kfree_skb_with_reason()' is
>> used in __udp4_lib_rcv().
>>
> 
> I don't follow all the discussions here, but IIRC it would be nice
> if we can provide the SNMP stat code (for instance, TCP_MIB_CSUMERRORS) to
> user-space, because those stats are already exposed to user-space, so
> you don't have to invent new ones.

Those SNMP macros are not unique and can not be fed into a generic
kfree_skb_reason function.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ