netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 1/2] net/smc: Resolve the race between link group access and termination

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Jan 2022 21:02:34 +0800
From:   Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com,
        tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 1/2] net/smc: Resolve the race between link
 group access and termination

Thanks for your reply.

On 2022/1/5 8:03 pm, Karsten Graul wrote:
> On 05/01/2022 09:27, Wen Gu wrote:
>> On 2022/1/3 6:36 pm, Karsten Graul wrote:
>>> On 31/12/2021 10:44, Wen Gu wrote:
>>>> On 2021/12/29 8:56 pm, Karsten Graul wrote:
>>>>> On 28/12/2021 16:13, Wen Gu wrote:
>>>>>> We encountered some crashes caused by the race between the access
>>>>>> and the termination of link groups.
>> So I think checking conn->alert_token_local has the same effect with checking conn->lgr to
>> identify whether the link group pointed by conn->lgr is still healthy and able to be used.
> 
> Yeah that sounds like a good solution for that! So is it now guaranteed that conn->lgr is always
> set and this check can really be removed completely, or should there be a new helper that checks
> conn->lgr and the alert_token, like smc_lgr_valid() ?

In my humble opinion, the link group pointed by conn->lgr might have the following
three stages if we remove 'conn->lgr = NULL' from smc_lgr_unregister_conn().

1. conn->lgr = NULL and conn->alert_token_local is zero

This means that the connection has never been registered in a link group. conn->lgr is clearly
unable to use.

2. conn->lgr != NULL and conn->alert_token_local is non-zero

This means that the connection has been registered in a link group, and conn->lgr is valid to access.

3. conn->lgr != NULL but conn->alert_token_local is zero

This means that the connection was registered in a link group before, but is unregistered from
it now. conn->lgr shouldn't be used anymore.

So I am trying this way:

1) Introduce a new helper smc_conn_lgr_state() to check the three stages mentioned above.

   enum smc_conn_lgr_state {
          SMC_CONN_LGR_ORPHAN,    /* conn was never registered in a link group */
          SMC_CONN_LGR_VALID,     /* conn is registered in a link group now */
          SMC_CONN_LGR_INVALID,   /* conn was registered in a link group, but now
                                     is unregistered from it and conn->lgr should
                                     not be used any more */
   };

2) replace the current conn->lgr check with the new helper.

These new changes are under testing now.

What do you think about it? :)

Thanks,
Wen Gu