lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYsVC0cOuxVB2A-WWv+zW7zEFNQGrD0WKWhhOWDbYw3PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:39:04 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/11] selftests/bpf: Add test for race in btf_try_get_module

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 1:04 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:50:33AM IST, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 09:51:15PM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> > > This adds a complete test case to ensure we never take references to
> > > modules not in MODULE_STATE_LIVE, which can lead to UAF, and it also
> > > ensures we never access btf->kfunc_set_tab in an inconsistent state.
> > >
> > > The test uses userfaultfd to artifically widen the race.
> >
> > Fancy!
> > Does it have to use a different module?
> > Can it be part of bpf_testmod somehow?
>
> I was thinking of doing it with bpf_testmod, but then I realised it would be a
> problem with parallel mode of test_progs, where another selftest in parallel may
> rely on bpf_testmod (which this test would unload, load and make it fault, and
> then fail the load before restoring it by loading again), so I went with
> bpf_testmod.
>
> Maybe we can hardcode a list of tests to be executed serially in --workers=n > 1
> mode? All serial tests are then executed in the beginning (or end), and then it
> starts invoking others in parallel as usual.

you can mark test as serial with "serial_" prefix, grep for that, we
have a bunch of tests like this. But if you are going to unload and
reload bpf_testmod, you will be forcing any bpf_testmod-using test to
be serial, which I'm not sure is such a great idea.

>
> --
> Kartikeya

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ