netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/11] selftests/bpf: Add test for race in btf_try_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Jan 2022 14:34:00 +0530
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/11] selftests/bpf: Add test for race in
 btf_try_get_module

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:50:33AM IST, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 09:51:15PM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> > This adds a complete test case to ensure we never take references to
> > modules not in MODULE_STATE_LIVE, which can lead to UAF, and it also
> > ensures we never access btf->kfunc_set_tab in an inconsistent state.
> >
> > The test uses userfaultfd to artifically widen the race.
>
> Fancy!
> Does it have to use a different module?
> Can it be part of bpf_testmod somehow?

I was thinking of doing it with bpf_testmod, but then I realised it would be a
problem with parallel mode of test_progs, where another selftest in parallel may
rely on bpf_testmod (which this test would unload, load and make it fault, and
then fail the load before restoring it by loading again), so I went with
bpf_testmod.

Maybe we can hardcode a list of tests to be executed serially in --workers=n > 1
mode? All serial tests are then executed in the beginning (or end), and then it
starts invoking others in parallel as usual.

--
Kartikeya