netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: remove ndo_get_phys_port_name and ndo_get_port_parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ydv9hZqDFVO4OhCt@nanopsycho>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jan 2022 10:33:57 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: remove ndo_get_phys_port_name
 and ndo_get_port_parent_id

Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 06:25:38PM CET, idosch@...sch.org wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 08:48:41PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> There are no legacy ports, DSA registers a devlink instance with ports
>> unconditionally for all switch drivers. Therefore, delete the old-style
>> ndo operations used for determining bridge forwarding domains.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
>Looks correct to me.

+1

>
>If ndo_get_phys_port_name() is not implemented, then
>devlink_compat_phys_port_name_get() is called which invokes
>ndo_get_devlink_port() that you have implemented. Similarly, for
>ndo_get_port_parent_id().
>
>Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>

Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>