netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] fprobe: Introduce fprobe function entry/exit probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YeAatqQTKsrxmUkS@krava>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:27:34 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] fprobe: Introduce fprobe function entry/exit
 probe

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:01:15PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:02:46PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi Jiri and Alexei,
> > 
> > Here is the 2nd version of fprobe. This version uses the
> > ftrace_set_filter_ips() for reducing the registering overhead.
> > Note that this also drops per-probe point private data, which
> > is not used anyway.
> > 
> > This introduces the fprobe, the function entry/exit probe with
> > multiple probe point support. This also introduces the rethook
> > for hooking function return as same as kretprobe does. This
> 
> nice, I was going through the multi-user-graph support 
> and was wondering that this might be a better way
> 
> > abstraction will help us to generalize the fgraph tracer,
> > because we can just switch it from rethook in fprobe, depending
> > on the kernel configuration.
> > 
> > The patch [1/8] and [7/8] are from your series[1]. Other libbpf
> > patches will not be affected by this change.
> 
> I'll try the bpf selftests on top of this

I'm getting crash and stall when running bpf selftests,
the fprobe sample module works fine, I'll check on that

jirka