[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB_54W5Uu9_hpqmeL0MC+1ps=yfn2j0-o46cBL7BeBxKXKHa4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 19:36:39 -0500
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
linux-wpan - ML <linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org Wireless"
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
David Girault <david.girault@...vo.com>,
Romuald Despres <romuald.despres@...vo.com>,
Frederic Blain <frederic.blain@...vo.com>,
Nicolas Schodet <nico@...fr.eu.org>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@...il.com>,
Xue Liu <liuxuenetmail@...il.com>, Alan Ott <alan@...nal11.us>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/41] net: ieee802154: at86rf230: Call the complete
helper when a transmission is over
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 19:34, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 06:55, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > ieee802154_xmit_complete() is the right helper to call when a
> > transmission is over. The fact that it completed or not is not really a
> > question, but drivers must tell the core that the completion is over,
> > even if it was canceled. Do not call ieee802154_wake_queue() manually,
> > in order to let full control of this task to the core.
> >
> > By using the complete helper we also avoid leacking the skb structure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
> > index 583f835c317a..1941e1f3d2ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
> > @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ at86rf230_async_error_recover_complete(void *context)
> > if (ctx->free)
> > kfree(ctx);
> >
> > - ieee802154_wake_queue(lp->hw);
> > + ieee802154_xmit_complete(lp->hw, lp->tx_skb, false);
>
> also this lp->tx_skb can be a dangled pointer, after xmit_complete()
> we need to set it to NULL in a xmit_error() we can check on NULL
> before calling kfree_skb().
>
forget the NULL checking, it's already done by core. However in some
cases this is called with a dangled pointer on lp->tx_skb.
- Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists