[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yec7oLxuO8HzhmYr@lore-desk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 23:13:52 +0100
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, shayagr@...zon.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, dsahern@...nel.org, brouer@...hat.com,
echaudro@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, saeed@...nel.org,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com, toke@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 bpf-next 19/23] bpf: generalise tail call map
compatibility check
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 06:28:31PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > seq_printf(m,
> > @@ -590,6 +589,7 @@ static void bpf_map_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *filp)
> > if (type) {
> > seq_printf(m, "owner_prog_type:\t%u\n", type);
> > seq_printf(m, "owner_jited:\t%u\n", jited);
> > + seq_printf(m, "owner_xdp_has_frags:\t%u\n", xdp_has_frags);
>
> Internal flag shouldn't be printed in fdinfo.
> In particular it's not correct for non-xdp progs.
ack, I will drop owner_xdp_has_frags.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists