[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7edb713-dd91-14e7-34ff-d8fb559e8e92@omp.ru>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:47:06 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
"ALSA Development Mailing List" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@...com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
"Saravanan Sekar" <sravanhome@...il.com>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
"Mark Gross" <markgross@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
"Mun Yew Tham" <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"Linux MMC List" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@....com>,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sre@...nel.org>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: platform: Rename platform_get_irq_optional()
to platform_get_irq_silent()
On 1/19/22 9:51 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
[...]
>>>>> It'd certainly be good to name anything that doesn't correspond to one
>>>>> of the existing semantics for the API (!) something different rather
>>>>> than adding yet another potentially overloaded meaning.
>>>>
>>>> It seems we're (at least) three who agree about this. Here is a patch
>>>> fixing the name.
>>>
>>> And similar number of people are on the other side.
>>
>> If someone already opposed to the renaming (and not only the name) I
>> must have missed that.
>>
>> So you think it's a good idea to keep the name
>> platform_get_irq_optional() despite the "not found" value returned by it
>> isn't usable as if it were a normal irq number?
>
> I meant that on the other side people who are in favour of Sergey's patch.
> Since that I commented already that I opposed the renaming being a standalone
> change.
>
> Do you agree that we have several issues with platform_get_irq*() APIs?
>
> 1. The unfortunate naming
Mmm, "what's in a name?"... is this the topmost prio issue?
> 2. The vIRQ0 handling: a) WARN() followed by b) returned value 0
This is the most severe issue, I think...
> 3. The specific cookie for "IRQ not found, while no error happened" case
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists