[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fabb8166-e3a9-c48e-073b-cdbbe8c62714@omp.ru>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:49:52 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
"ALSA Development Mailing List" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@...com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
"Saravanan Sekar" <sravanhome@...il.com>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
"William Breathitt Gray" <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"Benson Leung" <bleung@...omium.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@....at>,
Mun Yew Tham <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>,
"Eric Auger" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"Linux MMC List" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@....com>,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sre@...nel.org>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional
On 1/19/22 9:58 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
[...]
>> Because with your change we have:
>>
>> - < 0 -> error
>> - == 0 -> no irq
>> - > 0 -> irq
>>
>> For my part I'd say this doesn't justify the change, but at least I
>> could better life with the reasoning. If you start at:
>>
>> irq = platform_get_irq_optional(...)
>> if (irq < 0 && irq != -ENXIO)
>> return irq
>> else if (irq > 0)
>> setup_irq(irq);
>> else
>> setup_polling()
>>
>> I'd change that to
>>
>> irq = platform_get_irq_optional(...)
>> if (irq > 0) /* or >= 0 ? */
>> setup_irq(irq)
>> else if (irq == -ENXIO)
>> setup_polling()
>> else
>> return irq
>>
>> This still has to mention -ENXIO, but this is ok and checking for 0 just
>> hardcodes a different return value.
>
> It's what we are against of. The idea is to have
>
> irq = platform_get_irq_optional(...)
> if (irq < 0) // we do not care about special cookies here
> return irq;
>
> if (irq)
> setup_irq(irq)
> else
> setup_polling()
>
> See the difference? Your code is convoluted.
... and it's longer when you look at the translated code! :-)
[...]
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists