netdev - RE: tdc errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CY4PR1301MB21674FE087906ABD054E6955E75B9@CY4PR1301MB2167.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jan 2022 07:13:34 +0000
From:   Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@...igine.com>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>
CC:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: RE: tdc errors

Thanks for bring this to us, we will upstream the single action offload support to the iproute2.
On Friday, January 21, 2022 3:34 AM, Jamal wrote:
>On 2022-01-20 12:22, Victor Nogueira wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When running these 2 tdc tests:
>>
>> 7d64 Add police action with skip_hw option
>> 3329 Validate flags of the matchall filter with skip_sw and police
>> action with skip_hw I get this error:
>>
>> Bad action type skip_hw
>> Usage: ... gact <ACTION> [RAND] [INDEX]
>> Where: ACTION := reclassify | drop | continue | pass | pipe | goto
>> chain <CHAIN_INDEX> | jump <JUMP_COUNT> RAND := random <RANDTYPE>
>> <ACTION> <VAL> RANDTYPE := netrand | determ VAL : = value not
>> exceeding 10000 JUMP_COUNT := Absolute jump from start of action list
>> INDEX := index value used
>>
>> I'm building the kernel on net-next.
>>
>> I'm compiling the latest iproute2 version.
>>
>> It seems like the problem is that support is lacking for skip_hw in
>> police action in iproute2.
>>
>
>
>So... How is the robot not reporting this as a regression?
>Davide? Basically kernel has the feature but code is missing in both iproute2
>and iproute2-next..
>
>cheers,
>jamal