netdev - Re: [PATCH] inet: missing lock releases in udp.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ye2zN0R/R9uKEUNa@pop-os.localdomain>
Date:   Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:57:43 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     ycaibb <ycaibb@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org,
        kuba@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: missing lock releases in udp.c

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:15:53AM +0800, ycaibb wrote:
> From: Ryan Cai <ycaibb@...il.com>
> 
> In method udp_get_first, the lock hslot->lock is not released when afinfo->family == AF_UNSPEC || sk->sk_family == afinfo->family is true. This patch fixes the problem by adding the unlock statement.
> 

It should be unlocked by udp_seq_stop(). Do you see any real lockdep
warning or bug report?

Thanks.