lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALrw=nFwuo=OWzDimGK0MyqLs4LBu9_WkKxXLpw+e2oTJAD8Lw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:55:14 +0000 From: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Amir Razmjou <arazmjou@...udflare.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 3/9] sit: allow encapsulated IPv6 traffic to be delivered locally On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 3:50 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:12:52 -0500 Sasha Levin wrote: > > From: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com> > > > > [ Upstream commit ed6ae5ca437d9d238117d90e95f7f2cc27da1b31 ] > > > > While experimenting with FOU encapsulation Amir noticed that encapsulated IPv6 > > traffic fails to be delivered, if the peer IP address is configured locally. > > Unless Ignat and Amir need it I'd vote for not backporting this to LTS. > This patch is firmly in the "this configuration was never supported" > category. 5.15 and 5.16 are probably fine. We planned to use it on 5.15 and onwards. Not backporting to 5.10 is fine for us.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists