[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5f9d6820e0548cb3304cbb49bcb84bedb15d7403.1643274380.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:08:40 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: delete duplicated functions that calls same xfrm_api_check()
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
The xfrm_dev_register() and xfrm_dev_feat_change() have same
implementation of one call to xfrm_api_check(). Instead of doing such
indirection, call to xfrm_api_check() directly and delete duplicated
functions.
Fixes: 92a2320697f7 ("xfrm: check for xdo_dev_ops add and delete")
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
index 3fa066419d37..36d6c1835844 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
@@ -380,16 +380,6 @@ static int xfrm_api_check(struct net_device *dev)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
-static int xfrm_dev_register(struct net_device *dev)
-{
- return xfrm_api_check(dev);
-}
-
-static int xfrm_dev_feat_change(struct net_device *dev)
-{
- return xfrm_api_check(dev);
-}
-
static int xfrm_dev_down(struct net_device *dev)
{
if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP)
@@ -404,10 +394,10 @@ static int xfrm_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void
switch (event) {
case NETDEV_REGISTER:
- return xfrm_dev_register(dev);
+ return xfrm_api_check(dev);
case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
- return xfrm_dev_feat_change(dev);
+ return xfrm_api_check(dev);
case NETDEV_DOWN:
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists