netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, x86: remove unnecessary handling of BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <164332020913.6471.16764153839958663792.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 21:50:09 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, kafai@...com, yhs@...com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, jackmanb@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf,
 x86: remove unnecessary handling of BPF_SUB atomic op

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:32:40 +0800 you wrote:
> According to the LLVM commit (https://reviews.llvm.org/D72184),
> sync_fetch_and_sub() is implemented as a negation followed by
> sync_fetch_and_add(), so there will be no BPF_SUB op and just
> remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf, x86: remove unnecessary handling of BPF_SUB atomic op
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b6ec79518ef0

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html