[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW_AufMOLJjtcO3hp-GwD0Q6iDL1=SD6Fq+Xe5wL46Yow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 09:58:12 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sh_eth: sh_eth_close() always returns 0
Hi Sergei,
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 3:00 AM Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru> wrote:
> sh_eth_close() always returns 0, hence the check in sh_eth_wol_restore()
> is pointless (however we cannot change the prototype of sh_eth_close() as
> it implements the driver's ndo_stop() method).
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
> analysis tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
Thanks for your patch!
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Note that there's a second call in sh_eth_suspend().
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists