lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 5 Feb 2022 17:32:54 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sunhme: fix the version number in struct
 ethtool_drvinfo

> > If it is not used anywhere else, yes, you can remove it.
> 
> Of course it prints the number on module load… but otherwise it does nothing 
> with it.

You could remove that as well.

The basic problem is, the version string does not identify the sources
with enough accuracy. It says nothing about back ported fixes in
stable kernels. It tells you nothing about vendor patches to the
network core, etc.

	Andrew


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ